Self-absorbed, yet interesting?
Two kinds of criticism are often raised against contemporary general jurisprudence – the part of legal philosophy dealing with the most abstract questions about law. The more fundamental criticism claims that questions discussed by general jurisprudence might actually not be interesting for other sc...
Tallennettuna:
| Julkaisussa: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/revus, |
|---|---|
| Päätekijä: | |
| Aineistotyyppi: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Kieli: | Anglais |
| Julkaistu: |
Revus
2025
|
| Aiheet: | |
| Linkit: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |