Tennessee Williams, the Playwright-Painter: Vieux Carré and Something Cloudy, Something Clear at the Crossroads between Text and Image
“Snatching the eternal out of the desperately fleeting is the great magic trick of human existence”, Tennessee Williams wrote in 1951 in an essay devoted to The Rose Tattoo, entitled “The Timeless World of a Play” (61). What the statement reveals is the American playwright’s conception of art as a m...
שמור ב:
| הוצא לאור ב: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/polysemes, |
|---|---|
| מחבר ראשי: | |
| פורמט: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| שפה: | Anglais |
| יצא לאור: |
Polysèmes
2017
|
| נושאים: | |
| גישה מקוונת: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| סיכום: | “Snatching the eternal out of the desperately fleeting is the great magic trick of human existence”, Tennessee Williams wrote in 1951 in an essay devoted to The Rose Tattoo, entitled “The Timeless World of a Play” (61). What the statement reveals is the American playwright’s conception of art as a means of fighting against the passing of time, against the “awful sense of impermanence” (61) that never stopped haunting him. But the stage is not the only place where, as Williams wrote in the same essay, “time is arrested in the sense of being confined” (61). The sketches and paintings he made throughout his life reveal the same obsession with time, the same desire to freeze the intensity of the moment into the work of art. Two paintings, made in 1975 and 1977, shed new light on two of his late plays, Vieux Carré and Something Cloudy, Something Clear. Written at the end of his life, both plays are attempts at capturing the totality of experience. In them, Williams intertwines past and present, life and art, combining movement and stasis to achieve a synthesis his paintings echo, or mirror, though in a very different way. The examination of these unknown paintings in relation to the plays is meant to engage us in a dialogue between texts and images. What the dialogical perspective reveals is a temporality that is circular rather than linear, anachronistic rather than chronological. Williams the painter and Williams the playwright blur the limits of space and time to reach that region where the distinctions between text and image collapse as one becomes the mirror of the other, its “horizon,” as Jean-Luc Nancy writes in Au Fond des images. There, words fail and figures dissolve; there, silence and haziness confront the reader/spectator with the timelessness of art, not as something eternal or transcendent, but rather as a magic interval where the intensity of the vanishing moment can be captured. In the scripts of his plays as well as in his paintings, Williams faces us with the mystery of time, with an elusiveness that he considers as the only true essence of his art. Through a comparative analysis of two of his paintings with two of his late plays, I intend to show how the verbal and the visual interconnect in Williams’s art, how his texts as well as his paintings convey a sense of “intense immobility” that is the artist’s way of beating “the game of being against non-being” (Williams 2009, 61). |
|---|