Plurality and continuity
The objective of this article is to explore the complexity and continuity of self-identities of persons with intellectual disability. This is done by close reading of four life stories. The findings are that intellectually disabled people’s self-identities are basically plural and fluid. A fruitful...
Сохранить в:
| Опубликовано в: : | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/alterjdr, |
|---|---|
| Главные авторы: | , , |
| Формат: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Язык: | Anglais |
| Опубликовано: |
Alter
2026
|
| Предметы: | |
| Online-ссылка: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Итог: | The objective of this article is to explore the complexity and continuity of self-identities of persons with intellectual disability. This is done by close reading of four life stories. The findings are that intellectually disabled people’s self-identities are basically plural and fluid. A fruitful approach to understanding this plurality is given by “positioning theory” developed by Harré & Langenhove. We analyze the subject’s sense of continuity in terms of our own concept of “inner dialogue.” Our point of departure is a review of literature with special focus on multiple identities. We distinguish between three strands of knowledge within this field: (1) sociological studies of other-defined, identities, which are hard to change; (2) psychological studies of dynamic, self-defined identities characterized by adaptation and continuity, and (3) discursive studies of fluid and plural self- and other-defined identities. The third strand has contributed significantly to the field of disability studies by transcending the classic dichotomy of normalcy or deviancy (of identity) of persons with intellectual disabilities. In our aim to probe deeper into the issues of plurality and continuity of self-defined identities, we turn to Stuart Hall’s noteworthy text: “Who needs identity?” (Hall & Du Gay, 1996). Hall proposes that a new direction for a theory of identity needs to build on input from discursive studies, but it should also embrace the question of how the subject maintains a sense of personal continuity. |
|---|