L’administration liquide
Postmodernity has led to the advent of a “liquid society,” as opposed to the “solid society” that preceded it. This “post-postmodern” society dilutes classical models, including in terms of administrative action. First of all, it leads to a fluid effect of the administration. Indeed, it leads to the...
Guardat en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Idioma: | Français |
| Publicat: |
2024
|
| Matèries: | |
| Accés en línia: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Sumari: | Postmodernity has led to the advent of a “liquid society,” as opposed to the “solid society” that preceded it. This “post-postmodern” society dilutes classical models, including in terms of administrative action. First of all, it leads to a fluid effect of the administration. Indeed, it leads to the transfer of the entire frame of reference of administrative democracy to the individual. The result is a recomposed administrative sociability and a dilution of administrative action. It is the administrative identity of the public that is “liquefied”, as a result of the development of an individualistic approach to public service, which undermines the relationship between administration and public. It then leads to a liquefaction effect of the administrative relationship. Thus, it tends to call into question administrative democracy, through an administrative action that no longer guarantees the general interest. Under the guise of progress, this produces various perverse effects, such as administrative disembodiment and blurring of the administrative identity. The public, which could have hoped to be part of a clear administrative trajectory, is now confronted with a requirement for administrative mobility that it is often not able to control. |
|---|