Libertà, necessità e legge. Il problema teologico-politico nella polemica tra Hobbes e Bramhall
The controversy against the Anglican Archbishop John Bramhall, in which Thomas Hobbes has been engaged for more than two decades, is one of the most significant steps in the treatment of the theological-political problem by the author of the Leviathan. Focusing on the concept of freedom, on the rela...
Zapisane w:
| Wydane w: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/tp, |
|---|---|
| 1. autor: | |
| Format: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Język: | Italien |
| Wydane: |
Teoria politica
2020
|
| Hasła przedmiotowe: | |
| Dostęp online: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Streszczenie: | The controversy against the Anglican Archbishop John Bramhall, in which Thomas Hobbes has been engaged for more than two decades, is one of the most significant steps in the treatment of the theological-political problem by the author of the Leviathan. Focusing on the concept of freedom, on the relationship between will and deliberation, on the relationship between divine omnipotence and free will (and therefore also about the meaning of divine justice and sin), the dispute clearly reveals an intrinsic theological-political character: for both protagonists, this scholastic opposition shows the respective positions in the interpretation of the events of the Civil Wars (1638-1649) and the Interregnum (1649-1660). |
|---|