Przewrotne ontologie, splecione historyczności
The ontological modes defined by Philippe Descola may exist independently of each other, but indigeneous ontologies as concrete instances develop within a broader context (vis-à-vis this context). Thus, while the indigenous perspective, in principle, provides an alternative to the Western one, some...
Сохранить в:
| Опубликовано в: : | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/td, |
|---|---|
| Главный автор: | |
| Формат: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Язык: | Polonais |
| Опубликовано: |
Teksty Drugie
2025
|
| Предметы: | |
| Online-ссылка: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Итог: | The ontological modes defined by Philippe Descola may exist independently of each other, but indigeneous ontologies as concrete instances develop within a broader context (vis-à-vis this context). Thus, while the indigenous perspective, in principle, provides an alternative to the Western one, some components of local knowledge directly intertwine with the Western knowledge regime, expressing the broader colonial experience. In other words, indigenous historicities are part of Western history. The author analyzes the subversiveness of indigenous ontologies based on two cases: ex-Slovincians and Rodnovery. |
|---|