Internal legal positivism refined
In this article I will try to answer some of the comments and criticisms raised by authors who participated in the discussion of my book ‘Internal’ legal positivism. I have grouped the criticisms into six points; the first, on the possibility of an internal legal positivism and the plurality of meth...
Saved in:
| In: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/revus, |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Language: | Anglais |
| Published: |
Revus
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Summary: | In this article I will try to answer some of the comments and criticisms raised by authors who participated in the discussion of my book ‘Internal’ legal positivism. I have grouped the criticisms into six points; the first, on the possibility of an internal legal positivism and the plurality of methodological approaches in relation to law. The second, the ambiguity of the “internal” - “external” distinction. The third, on conventionalism in general and interpretive conventions in particular. The fourth, on natural law and (methodological) anti-positivism. The fifth, on participants and acceptants, cognitivists or non-cognitivists, and the last, on the law as a reason for action. |
|---|