Post-sovereign constitution-making and stages of representation
This article builds on Andrew Arato’s paradigm of post-sovereign constitution-making as a multi-stage process bringing together different actors. Drawing on the systemic account of democratic representation, the article makes a twofold contribution. First, through an inquiry into the representative...
Enregistré dans:
| Udgivet i: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/revus, |
|---|---|
| Hovedforfatter: | |
| Format: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Sprog: | Anglais |
| Udgivet: |
Revus
2020
|
| Fag: | |
| Online adgang: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Summary: | This article builds on Andrew Arato’s paradigm of post-sovereign constitution-making as a multi-stage process bringing together different actors. Drawing on the systemic account of democratic representation, the article makes a twofold contribution. First, through an inquiry into the representative dimension of the multi-stage paradigm, it introduces the idea of a representative continuum: a sequence of different, but connected, actors and activities that form a representative whole across different stages. Second, the article offers reflections upon the place and role that courts may occupy within such continuum. |
|---|