What do we mean by constitutional supremacy?

What do we mean by constitutional supremacy?

This paper offers a comment on Paolo Sandro’s “The making of constitutional democracy”. It discusses Sandro’s choice of defining modern constitutionalism as legal otherness from two perspectives. First, Sandro’s methodological option for discussing constitutional theory is addressed by looking at le...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Dans:URI:https://journals.openedition.org/revus,
Auteur principal: Romeo, Graziella
Format: Article ou chapitre numérique
Langue:Anglais
Publié: Revus 2024
Sujets:
constitutional democracy
judicial review
constitutional supremacy
legal traditions
contingency
Accès en ligne:Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
id openedition-oai:revues.org:revus_10021
record_format openedition
spelling openedition-oai:revues.org:revus_10021 https://doi.org/10.4000/revus.10021 urn:doi:10.4000/revus.10021 en https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10021 2024-03-13T01:00:00Z info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess article info:eu-repo/semantics/article urn:handle:20.500.13089/w0io https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ What do we mean by constitutional supremacy? Revus Klub Revus info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/1855-7112 info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/1581-7652 URI:https://journals.openedition.org/revus Romeo, Graziella constitutional democracy judicial review constitutional supremacy legal traditions contingency This paper offers a comment on Paolo Sandro’s “The making of constitutional democracy”. It discusses Sandro’s choice of defining modern constitutionalism as legal otherness from two perspectives. First, Sandro’s methodological option for discussing constitutional theory is addressed by looking at legal traditions, clarifying the extent to which comparative constitutional law can help the development of studies in legal theory. Second, it addresses the accounts of constitutionalism that Sandro introduces in his work to set the scene for the discussion of the conditions for the existence and endurance of constitutional democracy.
collection OpenEdition Journal
language Anglais
format Article ou chapitre numérique
building 0/Bibliothèque numérique/
1/Bibliothèque numérique/OpenEdition Journals/
topic constitutional democracy
judicial review
constitutional supremacy
legal traditions
contingency
spellingShingle constitutional democracy
judicial review
constitutional supremacy
legal traditions
contingency
Romeo, Graziella
What do we mean by constitutional supremacy?
description This paper offers a comment on Paolo Sandro’s “The making of constitutional democracy”. It discusses Sandro’s choice of defining modern constitutionalism as legal otherness from two perspectives. First, Sandro’s methodological option for discussing constitutional theory is addressed by looking at legal traditions, clarifying the extent to which comparative constitutional law can help the development of studies in legal theory. Second, it addresses the accounts of constitutionalism that Sandro introduces in his work to set the scene for the discussion of the conditions for the existence and endurance of constitutional democracy.
author Romeo, Graziella
author_facet Romeo, Graziella
author_sort Romeo, Graziella
title What do we mean by constitutional supremacy?
title_short What do we mean by constitutional supremacy?
title_full What do we mean by constitutional supremacy?
title_fullStr What do we mean by constitutional supremacy?
title_full_unstemmed What do we mean by constitutional supremacy?
title_sort what do we mean by constitutional supremacy?
publisher Revus
publishDate 2024
container_title URI:https://journals.openedition.org/revus
url https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.4000/revus.10021
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10021
_version_ 1877292492475334656

Documents similaires