Between Walras and Ricardo. Ladislaus von Bortkievicz and the origin of neo-ricardian theory
1. – IntroductionLadislaus von Bortkievicz, «by far the most eminent German statistician since Lexis» (Schumpeter 1932, p. 338), is known in the history of economic theory principally, as Schumpeter wrote, as «one of the most competent critics of Marx and Böhm-Bawerk» (Schumpeter, 1954, p. 851), –...
Salvato in:
| Pubblicato in: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/ress, |
|---|---|
| Autori principali: | , |
| Natura: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Lingua: | Anglais |
| Pubblicazione: |
Revue européenne des sciences sociales
2009
|
| Accesso online: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Riassunto: | 1. – IntroductionLadislaus von Bortkievicz, «by far the most eminent German statistician since Lexis» (Schumpeter 1932, p. 338), is known in the history of economic theory principally, as Schumpeter wrote, as «one of the most competent critics of Marx and Böhm-Bawerk» (Schumpeter, 1954, p. 851), – but it is also argued that «his essentially critical bent prevented him from producing, so far as economic theory is concerned, any creative work» (ibidem, p. 851), a judgement largely shared by hi... |
|---|