Revisiter l’histoire et le canon littéraires bulgares : quelle histoire littéraire de la Bulgarie ?
Since the beginning of the structuralist period, literary history has had to face a crisis, which in Bulgaria is combined with another crisis concerning literary criticism after 1989. Researchers and scholars have of course started to question some aspects of the literary model, of the acknowledged...
Bewaard in:
| Gepubliceerd in: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/res, |
|---|---|
| Hoofdauteur: | |
| Formaat: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Taal: | Français |
| Gepubliceerd in: |
Revue des études slaves
2018
|
| Online toegang: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Samenvatting: | Since the beginning of the structuralist period, literary history has had to face a crisis, which in Bulgaria is combined with another crisis concerning literary criticism after 1989. Researchers and scholars have of course started to question some aspects of the literary model, of the acknowledged periodisation and the national myths and to conceptualize it in its entirety. But there is still no Bulgarian literary history, which could dynamically mix reception (sociology) and conditions of production of the works, debates (ideological, translative and so on), anthropology, history, literary history, broad cultural and artistic context. The aim in this paper is to outline the main aspects of a new Bulgarian literary history, anxious to reconsider the Bulgarian model, to bring into question notions and dichotomies accepted without discussion, to propose a dynamic construction, to examine concepts which are not frequent but nevertheless functional, to reveal the tensions which go through the Bulgarian literary field. |
|---|