The Judge and the Employer’s Management Powers in Turkey
Based on provisions of the Labour Code, and in view to protect the workers, Turkish labour courts tend to use largely their powers. In particular, courts consider in certain cases workers of a subcontractor as employees of the beneficiary enterprise, and contracts with defined term as contracts with...
Сохранить в:
| Опубликовано в: : | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/rdctss, |
|---|---|
| Главный автор: | |
| Формат: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Язык: | Anglais |
| Опубликовано: |
Revue de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité sociale
2024
|
| Предметы: | |
| Online-ссылка: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Итог: | Based on provisions of the Labour Code, and in view to protect the workers, Turkish labour courts tend to use largely their powers. In particular, courts consider in certain cases workers of a subcontractor as employees of the beneficiary enterprise, and contracts with defined term as contracts with an indefinite term. Within the protection against termination, the jurisprudence has established principles that guide the interference by the judge: termination of labour is a last resort, should be applied in moderation and without entering in contradiction with other managerial decisions. The choice of those to dismiss must base on objective criteria duly documented. In final, the principles of equality (art. 5 of the Labour Code) and good faith (art. 2 of the Civil Code) coupled by the protection of employment, are the main foundations for judges’ interference, which thus goes beyond the limits set by the law. |
|---|