Redundancy and Judicial Power: Between Inaction and Creative Boldness
The purpose of this review is to develop an understanding of comparative laws and practices in respect of redundancy law. In this regard the focus will be on international instruments (primarily Recommendation 119 of 1963 and 166 of 1982 and Convention 158 of the International Labour Organisation (...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/rdctss, |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Sprache: | Anglais |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Revue de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité sociale
2021
|
| Online Zugang: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Zusammenfassung: | The purpose of this review is to develop an understanding of comparative laws and practices in respect of redundancy law. In this regard the focus will be on international instruments (primarily Recommendation 119 of 1963 and 166 of 1982 and Convention 158 of the International Labour Organisation (ILO) and the European Union’s Directive on Collective Redundancies (Council Directive 98/59/ EC of 20 July 1998) and the position in several domestic jurisdictions.The term ‘redundancy’ appears to ... |
|---|