Open Science e valutazione: non solo una questione di “alternative”
The Open Science-evaluation binomial can be read in both directions: evaluation for Open Science and Open Science for evaluation.A comprehensive definition of Open Science, still misunderstood, is the starting point to analyse in backlight the current research assessment system and to explore how Op...
में बचाया:
| में प्रकाशित: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/qds, |
|---|---|
| मुख्य लेखक: | |
| स्वरूप: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| भाषा: | Italien |
| प्रकाशित: |
Quaderni di Sociologia
2025
|
| ऑनलाइन पहुंच: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| id |
openedition-oai:revues.org:qds_7111 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
openedition |
| spelling |
openedition-oai:revues.org:qds_7111 https://doi.org/10.4000/13k0j urn:doi:10.4000/13k0j it https://journals.openedition.org/qds/7111 2025-03-24T01:00:00Z info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess article info:eu-repo/semantics/article urn:handle:20.500.13089/13k0j https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Open Science e valutazione: non solo una questione di “alternative” Quaderni di Sociologia Rosenberg & Sellier info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2421-5848 info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/0033-4952 URI:https://journals.openedition.org/qds Giglia, Elena The Open Science-evaluation binomial can be read in both directions: evaluation for Open Science and Open Science for evaluation.A comprehensive definition of Open Science, still misunderstood, is the starting point to analyse in backlight the current research assessment system and to explore how Open Science can at the same time enable the change and being by it enabled.The shift from a hypercompetitive assessment framework towards a system where the entire research process has its value and collaboration and interdisciplinarity are rewarded is crucial to foster and spread the adoption of Open Science practices: here is the role for evaluation in making Open Science possible.Open Science practices like preregistration, open peer review, open lab notebooks, FAIR data, and citizen science can play a role in getting rid of the tyranny of journals, and in ensuring a better quality of the research process through transparency and reproducibility. |
| collection |
OpenEdition Journal |
| language |
Italien |
| format |
Article ou chapitre numérique |
| building |
0/Bibliothèque numérique/ 1/Bibliothèque numérique/OpenEdition Journals/ |
| description |
The Open Science-evaluation binomial can be read in both directions: evaluation for Open Science and Open Science for evaluation.A comprehensive definition of Open Science, still misunderstood, is the starting point to analyse in backlight the current research assessment system and to explore how Open Science can at the same time enable the change and being by it enabled.The shift from a hypercompetitive assessment framework towards a system where the entire research process has its value and collaboration and interdisciplinarity are rewarded is crucial to foster and spread the adoption of Open Science practices: here is the role for evaluation in making Open Science possible.Open Science practices like preregistration, open peer review, open lab notebooks, FAIR data, and citizen science can play a role in getting rid of the tyranny of journals, and in ensuring a better quality of the research process through transparency and reproducibility. |
| author |
Giglia, Elena |
| spellingShingle |
Giglia, Elena Open Science e valutazione: non solo una questione di “alternative” |
| author_facet |
Giglia, Elena |
| author_sort |
Giglia, Elena |
| title |
Open Science e valutazione: non solo una questione di “alternative” |
| title_short |
Open Science e valutazione: non solo una questione di “alternative” |
| title_full |
Open Science e valutazione: non solo una questione di “alternative” |
| title_fullStr |
Open Science e valutazione: non solo una questione di “alternative” |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Open Science e valutazione: non solo una questione di “alternative” |
| title_sort |
open science e valutazione: non solo una questione di “alternative” |
| publisher |
Quaderni di Sociologia |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| container_title |
URI:https://journals.openedition.org/qds |
| url |
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.4000/13k0j https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://journals.openedition.org/qds/7111 |
| _version_ |
1877292099457515520 |