Open Science e valutazione: non solo una questione di “alternative”
The Open Science-evaluation binomial can be read in both directions: evaluation for Open Science and Open Science for evaluation.A comprehensive definition of Open Science, still misunderstood, is the starting point to analyse in backlight the current research assessment system and to explore how Op...
Shranjeno v:
| izdano v: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/qds, |
|---|---|
| Glavni avtor: | |
| Format: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Jezik: | Italien |
| Izdano: |
Quaderni di Sociologia
2025
|
| Online dostop: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Izvleček: | The Open Science-evaluation binomial can be read in both directions: evaluation for Open Science and Open Science for evaluation.A comprehensive definition of Open Science, still misunderstood, is the starting point to analyse in backlight the current research assessment system and to explore how Open Science can at the same time enable the change and being by it enabled.The shift from a hypercompetitive assessment framework towards a system where the entire research process has its value and collaboration and interdisciplinarity are rewarded is crucial to foster and spread the adoption of Open Science practices: here is the role for evaluation in making Open Science possible.Open Science practices like preregistration, open peer review, open lab notebooks, FAIR data, and citizen science can play a role in getting rid of the tyranny of journals, and in ensuring a better quality of the research process through transparency and reproducibility. |
|---|