The systemic implications of research evaluation reform: taking on CoARA commitments in Spain
This article addresses the challenges that the reform of research evaluation poses in research governance systems dominated by centralised management structures. Using the example of Spain, I show the difficulties of adjusting evaluation practices within such governance structures and emphasize the...
Salvato in:
| Pubblicato in: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/qds, |
|---|---|
| Autore principale: | |
| Natura: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Lingua: | Anglais |
| Pubblicazione: |
Quaderni di Sociologia
2025
|
| Accesso online: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Riassunto: | This article addresses the challenges that the reform of research evaluation poses in research governance systems dominated by centralised management structures. Using the example of Spain, I show the difficulties of adjusting evaluation practices within such governance structures and emphasize the systemic nature of the changes needed. Although reform efforts have focused on the development and the development and application of new evaluation tools, methods and processes, reform in countries like Spain needs more profound institutional changes. |
|---|