Luba Jurgenson et Nicolas Werth, Le Goulag : Témoignages et archives
Is it best to examine the history of the Gulag from literary or historical perspectives? Should one attempt to study the camps from below, through prisoners' own words, or is it better to analyze the Gulag through the reports written by state bureaucrats? As Luba Jurgenson and Nicolas Werth ar...
Kaydedildi:
| Yayımlandı: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/pipss, |
|---|---|
| Yazar: | |
| Materyal Türü: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Dil: | Anglais |
| Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: |
The Journal of power institutions in post-soviet societies
2019
|
| Konular: | |
| Online Erişim: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Özet: | Is it best to examine the history of the Gulag from literary or historical perspectives? Should one attempt to study the camps from below, through prisoners' own words, or is it better to analyze the Gulag through the reports written by state bureaucrats? As Luba Jurgenson and Nicolas Werth argue and demonstrate in Le Goulag : Témoignages et archives, it is not necessary to make such a choice. In fact, one shouldn't – as the editors show, it is only through the careful consideration of bo... |
|---|