Fédéralisme et Droits de l’homme aux Etats-Unis
This article studies the Supreme Court’s most recent death penalty jurisprudence, in particular Atkins and Ropers’ in which it ruled mentally retarded and juvenile defendants could no longer be executed. They were seen as victories by the supporters of human rights. This article also focuses on the...
שמור ב:
| הוצא לאור ב: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/nuevomundo, |
|---|---|
| מחבר ראשי: | |
| פורמט: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| שפה: | Français |
| יצא לאור: |
Nuevo mundo mundos nuevos
2008
|
| נושאים: | |
| גישה מקוונת: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| סיכום: | This article studies the Supreme Court’s most recent death penalty jurisprudence, in particular Atkins and Ropers’ in which it ruled mentally retarded and juvenile defendants could no longer be executed. They were seen as victories by the supporters of human rights. This article also focuses on the impact of federalism in the decision of the United States to keep the death penalty. |
|---|