The ‘three omissions’ principle – what is silenced by families in the novel of Positivism?
The article raises the problem of avoiding certain topics in family conversations, which images were written by Polish novel of the second half of the 19th century. Documentary materials were taken from the works of the following authors: Stanisław Grudziński, Natalia Korwin–Szymanowska, Waleria Mar...
Salvato in:
| Pubblicato in: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/napis, |
|---|---|
| Autore principale: | |
| Natura: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Lingua: | Anglais |
| Pubblicazione: |
Napis
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Riassunto: | The article raises the problem of avoiding certain topics in family conversations, which images were written by Polish novel of the second half of the 19th century. Documentary materials were taken from the works of the following authors: Stanisław Grudziński, Natalia Korwin–Szymanowska, Waleria Marrené–Morzkowska, Eliza Orzeszkowa, Bolesław Prus, and Henryk Sienkiewicz. Among them are very acknowledged authors, as well as secondary and forgotten ones. Due to such selection of sources, the phenomenon described in the article can be considered as an objective state of affairs. The nineteenth-century novel was subjected to rigours of censorship, forcing authors to cipher (Aesop's speech). The author proves that a moral taboo was more important in regulating the topics of conversation, which excluded speaking on some of them. The article justifies a thesis that it hindered dialogues within the family circle. This concerned mainly three areas: politics, money, and sexes (3 Ps in Polish). These areas of social life were dependent on legal regulations, which treated men preferentially. The absence of these topics in the conversations proves that the marriage did not have the democratic status of a partnership. |
|---|