Conclusion
At the end of our exploratory mission, let us take a moment to look back and ask ourselves a few questions: How did the themes of the three symposiums dealing with anthropological research in the Sepik area evolve? And how did the materiality of artworks as well as the creativity of artists, in sho...
Сохранить в:
| Опубликовано в: : | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/jso, |
|---|---|
| Главные авторы: | , , |
| Формат: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Язык: | Anglais |
| Опубликовано: |
Journal de la société des océanistes
2018
|
| Online-ссылка: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Итог: | At the end of our exploratory mission, let us take a moment to look back and ask ourselves a few questions: How did the themes of the three symposiums dealing with anthropological research in the Sepik area evolve? And how did the materiality of artworks as well as the creativity of artists, in short, the subject of art, become intrinsically linked with the more general approach comparing cultural entities or phenomena across the region? And last but not least, how does the materiality of ar... |
|---|