Resisting the participatory injunction?
Over the past few decades, the social sciences, particularly those that present themselves as “applied”, have undergone a transnational participatory turn, the effects of which we can now document in various fields but whose genesis cannot be understood without analyzing how action-participatory res...
Na minha lista:
| Publicado no: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/jda, |
|---|---|
| Auteurs principaux: | , , , |
| Formato: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Idioma: | Anglais |
| Publicado em: |
Journal des anthropologues
2025
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Acesso em linha: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Resumo: | Over the past few decades, the social sciences, particularly those that present themselves as “applied”, have undergone a transnational participatory turn, the effects of which we can now document in various fields but whose genesis cannot be understood without analyzing how action-participatory research has flourished across the Atlantic since the end of the last century. Instrumentalized by neo-liberal policies, this desire to directly involve the subjects of inquiry in the production of knowledge concerning them, while it may indeed contribute to the legitimization of minoritized or dominated knowledge and practices, constitutes a threat to the social sciences today, considering the fact that it takes the form of an injunction accentuating their deprofessionalization. Is another use of participation possible? This question underlies each of the following papers. |
|---|