Introduction
Theoretical attempts to define our contemporary visual regime have met with renewed difficulties as images have become increasingly ubiquitous. What might, with Mike Featherstone, be defined as the “ubiquitous” turn of the visual under the influence of media convergence has fostered a reappraisal o...
Enregistré dans:
| Dans: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/inmedia, |
|---|---|
| Auteurs principaux: | , |
| Format: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Publié: |
InMedia
2020
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Résumé: | Theoretical attempts to define our contemporary visual regime have met with renewed difficulties as images have become increasingly ubiquitous. What might, with Mike Featherstone, be defined as the “ubiquitous” turn of the visual under the influence of media convergence has fostered a reappraisal of visual experience as multimodal, both dematerialized and re-embodied, technologized and newly haptic. Images can no longer be read as entities endowed with fixed iconographic traits to be identif... |
|---|