Le résumé et le titrage automatique partagent-ils les mêmes objectifs ?
In the literature, automatic summarization and automatic titling tasks are often merged. It seems that a short summary can be considered as a relevant title. But can we compare a title and a summary without having previously studied their criteria? This study aims at positioning the emergent task of...
שמור ב:
| הוצא לאור ב: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/corela, |
|---|---|
| Auteurs principaux: | , , |
| פורמט: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| שפה: | Français |
| יצא לאור: |
Corela
2014
|
| נושאים: | |
| גישה מקוונת: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| סיכום: | In the literature, automatic summarization and automatic titling tasks are often merged. It seems that a short summary can be considered as a relevant title. But can we compare a title and a summary without having previously studied their criteria? This study aims at positioning the emergent task of automatic titling with regard to automatic summarization task. In this paper, we define a set of criteria according to the summary and to the title, and we analyze the results obtained with our method of automatic classification. This analysis enables to report real objectives of both tasks and to validate their relevance. |
|---|