Questions that Remain: Pieter Spierenburg’s reply to Randolph Roth
On 15 June 2011, the day on which I read Randolph Roth’s reply to my critical review, the Volkskrant published an item about an exhibition in a Leiden museum occasioned by the fact that in the Netherlands very few of the nineteen Dutchmen who had received the Nobel prize had a street named after th...
Kaydedildi:
| Yayımlandı: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/chs, |
|---|---|
| Yazar: | |
| Materyal Türü: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Dil: | Anglais |
| Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: |
Crime, Histoire & Sociétés
2013
|
| Online Erişim: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Özet: | On 15 June 2011, the day on which I read Randolph Roth’s reply to my critical review, the Volkskrant published an item about an exhibition in a Leiden museum occasioned by the fact that in the Netherlands very few of the nineteen Dutchmen who had received the Nobel prize had a street named after them. It is surely to Roth’s credit that he leads my thoughts into unexpected directions from where they would have stayed away without his book. The heading in the Volkskrant simply states: «the Dut... |
|---|