Eastern Orthodoxy. An histoire croisée and connected history approach
Ever since the 1990s and the beginning of a discussion over global history, debates between historians around terms such as transnational history, connected history and histoire croisée have proliferated. Sanjay Subrahmanyam has argued that practising connected history, implies that the historian f...
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/bchmc, |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Lenguaje: | Anglais |
| Publicado: |
Bulletin de correspondance hellénique moderne et contemporain
2020
|
| Acceso en línea: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Sumario: | Ever since the 1990s and the beginning of a discussion over global history, debates between historians around terms such as transnational history, connected history and histoire croisée have proliferated. Sanjay Subrahmanyam has argued that practising connected history, implies that the historian functions as a sort of electrician. He is out there repairing and re‑establishing the connections between different grids that national historiographies have disrupted for the sake of rendering nati... |
|---|