Dominique Urvoy, Marie-Thérèse Urvoy, Enquête sur le miracle coranique
Many contemporary English speakers versed in Enlightenment philosophy will be familiar with David Hume’s maxim that “No testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle unless it is of such a kind that its falsehood would be more miraculous than the fact that it tries to establish.” This concept of m...
Tallennettuna:
| Julkaisussa: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/bcai, |
|---|---|
| Päätekijä: | |
| Aineistotyyppi: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Kieli: | Français |
| Julkaistu: |
Bulletin critique des Annales islamologiques
2022
|
| Linkit: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Yhteenveto: | Many contemporary English speakers versed in Enlightenment philosophy will be familiar with David Hume’s maxim that “No testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle unless it is of such a kind that its falsehood would be more miraculous than the fact that it tries to establish.” This concept of miracle, largely associated with a violation of the laws of nature, is not absent from Arabic or Islamic tradition. Similarly, Arabic also contains the concept of miracles as “signs” (āya, pl. āyāt;... |
|---|