The Production of Project

This paper analyses how the myth of the individual architect as a subject of innovation is an abstract machinery for capturing the work of other architects. To do that, it develops a historical regressive analysis on how innovation is actually produced, and the limits in which it is bounded. Further...

Szczegółowa specyfikacja

Zapisane w:
Opis bibliograficzny
Wydane w:URI:https://journals.openedition.org/ardeth,
1. autor: de Lima Amaral, Camilo Vladimir
Format: Article ou chapitre numérique
Język:Anglais
Wydane: Ardeth 2020
Hasła przedmiotowe:
Dostęp online:Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
Opis
Streszczenie:This paper analyses how the myth of the individual architect as a subject of innovation is an abstract machinery for capturing the work of other architects. To do that, it develops a historical regressive analysis on how innovation is actually produced, and the limits in which it is bounded. Furthermore, it analyses the role of narratives in the interpellation of architectural subjects, and how it defines a position from which subjects can act politically in the field. By doing so, it unveils the mechanisms behind the architectural black boxes (the office and the prince chronicles). In order to provide a new political role for architecture, it builds a different conception of the subject that produces these projects, exploiting the idea of trans-subjectivity in architecture.