Tesi sull’Europa
Europe, considered as a unitary (or so presumed) construction, has a hybrid and swinging nature. What it keeps the European Union together today is the Euro and its rules; but it is also what divides it, or at least what puts it in tension. The flower of the States’ sovereignty lost a petal – the mo...
שמור ב:
| הוצא לאור ב: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/ardeth, |
|---|---|
| מחבר ראשי: | |
| פורמט: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| שפה: | Anglais |
| יצא לאור: |
Ardeth
2021
|
| נושאים: | |
| גישה מקוונת: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| סיכום: | Europe, considered as a unitary (or so presumed) construction, has a hybrid and swinging nature. What it keeps the European Union together today is the Euro and its rules; but it is also what divides it, or at least what puts it in tension. The flower of the States’ sovereignty lost a petal – the monetary sovereignty – but it didn’t become anything else: neither a federal sovereignty, nor a set of institutions capable of producing a unitary political will, within the EU. The European Union is not a unitary subject, and it is crossed by multiple political spaces. There are the spaces of the States, marked by physical and juridical walls; there is the NATO space; there are different frontiers: frontiers of hospitality regimes, human rights frontiers, but also the frontier between Euro and the other monetary spaces. |
|---|