The “employability” of disabled people in France

Following the passage of the French law of 2005 on equal rights and opportunities, the issue of the “employability” of disabled people became a matter of public discussion. To clarify the debate, the article briefly presents the evolution of this notion and its various meanings, from the social sphe...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Pubblicato in:URI:https://journals.openedition.org/alterjdr,
Autori principali: Lo, Seak-Hy, Ville, Isabelle
Natura: Article ou chapitre numérique
Lingua:Anglais
Pubblicazione: Alter 2026
Soggetti:
Accesso online:Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
Descrizione
Riassunto:Following the passage of the French law of 2005 on equal rights and opportunities, the issue of the “employability” of disabled people became a matter of public discussion. To clarify the debate, the article briefly presents the evolution of this notion and its various meanings, from the social sphere to employment policies. The concept of “employability” is then examined without any preconceived definition using empirical data from the national “Handicap-Santé” (disability-health) survey carried out in 2008 on the general population in France. Five groups illustrate employment patterns, social protection devices and types of disability: remaining employed until retirement; being employed thanks to social systems; leaving employment through “incapacity for work” systems; being employed through one’s own resources; and being in sheltered employment or inactive. This construct provides keys to understand how “employability” manifests itself. The results show that, unlike the vision of employability that is focused on individual characteristics and promoted by employment policies in Europe, addressing employability in the domain of disability is only meaningful when considering individuals in their environments. The results also show that disability systems encourage forms of employability but still appear to favour access to inactivity through “incapacity for work.”