Response to Murray Fraser
Murray Fraser and I agree about the importance of teaching architecture students a history of architecture that is global in scope. We believe in this as a matter of inclusiveness, as we teach students who come from all over the world, and as a matter of practicality, as we train global citizens, w...
保存先:
| 出版年: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/abe, |
|---|---|
| 第一著者: | |
| フォーマット: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| 言語: | Anglais |
| 出版事項: |
ABE Journal
2020
|
| オンライン･アクセス: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| 要約: | Murray Fraser and I agree about the importance of teaching architecture students a history of architecture that is global in scope. We believe in this as a matter of inclusiveness, as we teach students who come from all over the world, and as a matter of practicality, as we train global citizens, who may work almost anywhere. But above all, we do not believe in the inherent superiority—as both Banister Fletchers certainly did—of a line of descent that extends from the Greek temple to the Ame... |
|---|