Ambiguities in Terminology and Taxonomy as Factors in the Marginalization of Architectural Styles
Although the architectural canon has a reputation as a conservative monolithic corpus, its alleged hostility to novel approaches and readings cannot be regarded as the only factor responsible for the difficulties concerning its extension. Due to inherent complexities, myriad interpretations, and a...
Gardado en:
| Publicado en: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/abe, |
|---|---|
| Autor Principal: | |
| Formato: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Idioma: | Anglais |
| Publicado: |
ABE Journal
2012
|
| Sujets: | |
| Acceso en liña: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Résumé: | Although the architectural canon has a reputation as a conservative monolithic corpus, its alleged hostility to novel approaches and readings cannot be regarded as the only factor responsible for the difficulties concerning its extension. Due to inherent complexities, myriad interpretations, and a lack of uniformity in the different research areas, certain architectural styles are in part responsible themselves for their exclusion. Taking the architectural practice of orientalism as an examp... |
|---|