Facteurs contextuels influençant une stratégie systémique d’amélioration de la qualité : une étude qualitative
Introduction: Quality improvement has become a global priority as more countries become interested in systemic strategies, particularly that of the Quality Improvement Support Agency (QISA) strategy. Purpose of research: This study sets out to identify and document contextual factors that facilitate...
Đã lưu trong:
| Những tác giả chính: | , , |
|---|---|
| Định dạng: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Ngôn ngữ: | Français |
| Được phát hành: |
2024
|
| Những chủ đề: | |
| Truy cập trực tuyến: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Tóm tắt: | Introduction: Quality improvement has become a global priority as more countries become interested in systemic strategies, particularly that of the Quality Improvement Support Agency (QISA) strategy. Purpose of research: This study sets out to identify and document contextual factors that facilitate or hinder the perceived effects of QISAs. Methods: A study of two critical and pragmatic cases consisting of the QISAs HAS and INESSS was carried out through interviews, a focus group discussion, a non-participatory observation session, and the use of secondary data from in-depth documentary research. All data were recorded and processed confidentially using the QDA Miner 6.0.2 software in an inductive approach in two coding cycles and were validated by the participants. Results: The results showed that the contextual factors at the level of the internal environment included: leadership of agency actors; dissemination and support strategy for their productions and support for their implementation; availability and nature of human, informational, and material resources; organizational culture; training of actors; and coordination, coherence, and complementarity of the various activities of an agency. At the level of the external environment, the factors included: crises; institutional collaborations and partnerships at the national and international levels; collaborations and partnerships with system actors; public policy, governance, and leadership; legal provisions; health information system and data accessibility; and funding. Conclusions: These results are the first to be produced on this topic and complement the literature on QISAs and can thus inspire other jurisdictions. |
|---|