Le sexe des mystiques. Simone de Beauvoir et Jacques Lacan
Lacan’s aphorism “the woman does not exist” offers a counterpoint to Simone de Beauvoir’s equally famous “one is not born, but rather becomes, a woman.” The psychoanalyst had always considered that Beauvoir’s concept of a second sex was pure nonsense: “What is called sex – or even the second, when i...
שמור ב:
| מחבר ראשי: | |
|---|---|
| פורמט: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| שפה: | Français |
| יצא לאור: |
2025
|
| נושאים: | |
| גישה מקוונת: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| סיכום: | Lacan’s aphorism “the woman does not exist” offers a counterpoint to Simone de Beauvoir’s equally famous “one is not born, but rather becomes, a woman.” The psychoanalyst had always considered that Beauvoir’s concept of a second sex was pure nonsense: “What is called sex – or even the second, when it is a ninny.” This sticking point between Lacan and Beauvoir largely stems from their differing interpretations of mystics. This article aims to uncover the connections each figure had with mysticism. |
|---|