Julie K. Ward, Searching for the Divine in Plato and Aristotle, Philosophical Theoria and Traditional Practice, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2021, viii-208 p.

This paper analyzes the dramatic development of Plato’s Phaedrus in light of the literary topos of the choice of lives, specifically via a close comparison to Heracles’Choice, the apologue attributed to Prodicus in Xenophon’s Memorabilia. I argue that, by doing so, one can better appreciate the lite...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Chaintreuil, Ulysse
Formato: Article ou chapitre numérique
Idioma:Français
Publicado em: 2024
Acesso em linha:Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
Descrição
Resumo:This paper analyzes the dramatic development of Plato’s Phaedrus in light of the literary topos of the choice of lives, specifically via a close comparison to Heracles’Choice, the apologue attributed to Prodicus in Xenophon’s Memorabilia. I argue that, by doing so, one can better appreciate the literary background of the dramatic dilemma impinging on Phaedrus in the dialogue. In my analysis, Phaedrus faces two conflicting propositions on how to lead his life. Lysias represents the path of conventional rhetoric and a self-serving conception of love. In contrast, Socrates advocates for the path of philosophy, which redefines rhetoric and defends a divine-inspired idea of love. Like Heracles, Phaedrus is in a state of aporia, oscillating between contrasting life paths. Plato’s innovation lies in appropriating this topos to champion the pursuit of knowledge as the highest value and the philosopher’s life as the most choice-worthy. In this manner, one gains a clearer idea of what Socrates is attempting to persuade Phaedrus of and whether he is successful in this endeavor.