Cultural maladaptations in economics
Although the institutional and evolutionary approach in economics is still not so common, it is gaining momentum, and a growing number of economic analyses are done in the light of the Darwinian method. It is especially important since we have learnt from the evolutionary psychologists the sources o...
Сохранить в:
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Язык: | Français |
| Опубликовано: |
2025
|
| Предметы: | |
| Online-ссылка: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Итог: | Although the institutional and evolutionary approach in economics is still not so common, it is gaining momentum, and a growing number of economic analyses are done in the light of the Darwinian method. It is especially important since we have learnt from the evolutionary psychologists the sources of our biases, which often undermine classical rationality (which is the foundational concept of homo oeconomicus), and since we have learnt from the cultural anthropologists how much culture is adaptive, how it evolves and how strong may it influence agents’ economic decisions. The paper’s main objectives are threefold: Firstly, it is to sketch the Darwinian approach to culture as the powerful human-environmental adaptation, which goes far beyond any biological adaptation and facilitates the development and expansion of our specie. This part of the paper will outline what culture is in the Darwinian approach, what cultural variants are, and how they are transmitted between people and generations. Secondly, to draw attention to not-so-rare byproducts of culture, which are maladaptive cultural variants. Maladaptations are well recognized in biology and are also widely discussed among anthropologists. They know the mechanism of their emergence and the causes of their sustainability. Cultural maladaptations in economics are rarely discussed. There seem to be at least two reasons for their neglect in economics: they are misdefined. Even evolutionary-oriented economists usually apply a mental shortcut, considering a welfare or utility function to reflect the fitness function. However, in the evolutionary approach, welfare has only a loose connection with fitness. The maladaptations are also interpreted in terms of the so-called “big-mistake hypothesis”, which assumes that most of our declines from classical rationality are due to the maladjustment of our stone-age cognitive system to the modern world. Respectively, the third objective of the paper is to propose how contemporary economics and public policy may benefit from anthropologists’ Darwinian analysis of culture and especially cultural maladaptations, based on two examples, one purely economic (hedge funds strategies imitations) and one socio-economic, i.e. the impact of the “tribal instinct” on the immigration policy. JEL Codes : O10, O40, Z10. |
|---|