La responsabilité climatique devant le juge administratif, une instrumentalisation de la réparation à des fins de cessation de l’illicite ?
The "Case of the century" ruling on climate liability is indicative of some of the upheavals currently taking place in administrative liability litigation. Indeed, the ruling handed down by the Paris Administrative Court proves that the aim of the action is less curative than preventive, a...
Guardat en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Idioma: | Français |
| Publicat: |
2024
|
| Matèries: | |
| Accés en línia: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Sumari: | The "Case of the century" ruling on climate liability is indicative of some of the upheavals currently taking place in administrative liability litigation. Indeed, the ruling handed down by the Paris Administrative Court proves that the aim of the action is less curative than preventive, aiming at putting an end to unlawful behavior. Although this ruling is notable due to the implementation of the legislative requirement for compensation for ecological damage, it remains highly ambiguous as to the practical details of such compensation and seems to make it conditional on the issuing of an injunction. |
|---|