Une redéfinition de la clause de commerce dormante par la Cour suprême ? (ou quand les porcs modifient la constitution économique états-unienne)
The notorious Commerce Clause, found in the first article of the U.S. Constitution, constitutes the fundamental principle of American economic federalism. Despite the fact that, in the context of textual interpretation, it grants the federal government the power to regulate the national economy, the...
Spremljeno u:
| Glavni autor: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Jezik: | Français |
| Izdano: |
2025
|
| Teme: | |
| Online pristup: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Sažetak: | The notorious Commerce Clause, found in the first article of the U.S. Constitution, constitutes the fundamental principle of American economic federalism. Despite the fact that, in the context of textual interpretation, it grants the federal government the power to regulate the national economy, the Supreme court has historically created a doctrine, the dormant Commerce Clause, that prohibits the states from adopting protectionist laws that discriminate against the products of other states. This rule, considered essential for the establishment of a common market within a federal entity, has been subjected to a process of deconstruction by the U.S. Supreme court justices. In fact, the court’s recent jurisprudential policy is an attempt to change the balance of the American federalism by reducing the powers of the federal entities, i.e. the states. The recent decision, National Pork Producers v. Ross, illustrates this phenomenon in a very clear and precise way. This Article attempts to analyze this case by examining the conceptual origins of the Dormant Commerce Clause doctrine and the potential impact of this jurisprudential trend on economic regulation. |
|---|