En quel sens parler d'une singularité d'Auschwitz ?
Is it possible, with the resources social sciences offer, to resolve the thorny problem of the very singularity of Auschwitz? It would seem not. Hence the reason for having recourse to what Adorno refers to as a ‘transformed theology', allowing the Shoah to be situated in its rightful place. Wh...
Gorde:
| Egile nagusia: | |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Hizkuntza: | Français |
| Argitaratua: |
2003
|
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| id |
cairn-RHSHO1_179_0270 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
cairn |
| spelling |
cairn-RHSHO1_179_0270RHSHO1Revue d’Histoire de la Shoah https://shs.cairn.info/revue-revue-d-histoire-de-la-shoah1-2003-3-page-269?lang=fr https://doi.org/10.3917/rhsho1.179.0270 En quel sens parler d'une singularité d'Auschwitz ? Figuier, Richard2003 fre Revue d’Histoire de la Shoah | 179 | 3 | 2003-10-01 | p. 269-275 | 1281-1505 RHSHO1_17992 Is it possible, with the resources social sciences offer, to resolve the thorny problem of the very singularity of Auschwitz? It would seem not. Hence the reason for having recourse to what Adorno refers to as a ‘transformed theology', allowing the Shoah to be situated in its rightful place. What is involved here is in fact the result of a project which conflicts in every detail with Creation according to Judeo-Christian thought and tradition. It is undoubtedly a project inspired by true originality, carried yet further through a certain modernist approach which we could perhaps say is reminiscent of Hobbesian perspectives as analysed since the fifties by Günther Anders, the nature of which is nowadays perceived openly in its true light: a door towards the very reshaping of the limits of this world.Cairn free access |
| language |
Français |
| format |
Article ou chapitre numérique |
| building |
0/Bibliothèque numérique/ 1/Bibliothèque numérique/Cairn/ |
| description |
Is it possible, with the resources social sciences offer, to resolve the
thorny problem of the very singularity of Auschwitz? It would seem not.
Hence the reason for having recourse to what Adorno refers to as a ‘transformed theology', allowing the Shoah to be situated in its rightful place.
What is involved here is in fact the result of a project which conflicts in
every detail with Creation according to Judeo-Christian thought and tradition. It is undoubtedly a project inspired by true originality, carried yet
further through a certain modernist approach which we could perhaps say
is reminiscent of Hobbesian perspectives as analysed since the fifties by
Günther Anders, the nature of which is nowadays perceived openly in its
true light: a door towards the very reshaping of the limits of this world. |
| author |
Figuier, Richard |
| spellingShingle |
Figuier, Richard En quel sens parler d'une singularité d'Auschwitz ? |
| author_facet |
Figuier, Richard |
| author_sort |
Figuier, Richard |
| title |
En quel sens parler d'une singularité d'Auschwitz ? |
| title_short |
En quel sens parler d'une singularité d'Auschwitz ? |
| title_full |
En quel sens parler d'une singularité d'Auschwitz ? |
| title_fullStr |
En quel sens parler d'une singularité d'Auschwitz ? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
En quel sens parler d'une singularité d'Auschwitz ? |
| title_sort |
en quel sens parler d'une singularité d'auschwitz ? |
| publishDate |
2003 |
| container_title |
|
| container_issue |
|
| url |
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://shs.cairn.info/revue-revue-d-histoire-de-la-shoah1-2003-3-page-269?lang=fr https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.3917/rhsho1.179.0270 |
| _version_ |
1877246649715130369 |