Le Premier ministre et le conseil constitutionnel : un jeu de l’amour et du hasard
The prime minister and the Constitutional Council have a privileged relationship in the exercise of constitutional justice. Since the 1970s, both institutions have established, through the intermediary of their general secretaries, close links in the process of a priori constitutionality review. Thr...
Gardado en:
| Autor Principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Idioma: | Français |
| Publicado: |
2025
|
| Acceso en liña: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Résumé: | The prime minister and the Constitutional Council have a privileged relationship in the exercise of constitutional justice. Since the 1970s, both institutions have established, through the intermediary of their general secretaries, close links in the process of a priori constitutionality review. Through the voice of the Government’s General Secretariat, the prime minister is the self-proclaimed defender of the law and, what’s more, he enjoys a privileged status vis à vis the other actors involved in the procedure. The instauration of the preliminary question of constitutionality in 2010 has not challenged the solidity of this institutional couple: while the head of government is a party equal to others in the new institutional procedure, he remains faithful to his paradoxical yet traditional mission of upholder of the law before the Constitutional Council. |
|---|