Su due codici dell’Epitome di Erodiano ad opera dello Ps.-Arcadio e sul cosiddetto ‘libro XX’
This paper argues that, as for the manuscript tradition of Ps.-Arcadius’ Epitome of the Καθολικὴ προσῳδία by Herodian, manuscript Parisinus gr. 2102 (C) was copied by the 16th-century scribe Jacob Diassorinos from another witness of that work, i.e. Parisinus gr. 2603 (B), while these two manuscri...
Salvato in:
| Pubblicato in: | Revue de philologie, de littérature et d'histoire anciennes | XCV | 2 | 2021-12-21 | p. 137-151 | 0035-1652 |
|---|---|
| Autore principale: | |
| Natura: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Lingua: | Français |
| Pubblicazione: |
2021
|
| Accesso online: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Riassunto: | This paper argues that, as for the manuscript tradition of Ps.-Arcadius’ Epitome of the Καθολικὴ προσῳδία by Herodian, manuscript Parisinus gr. 2102 (C) was copied by the 16th-century scribe Jacob Diassorinos from another witness of that work, i.e. Parisinus gr. 2603 (B), while these two manuscripts have so far always been thought to be codices gemelli coming from the same, lost antigraph. I also claim that Jacob Diassorinos took his sources for writing the so-called ‘Book 20’ of this epitome from the same manuscript: therefore, the inauthenticity of this book is ultimately confirmed. On this basis, it is also possible to complete our knowledge of Diassorinos’ role as a forger, a portrayal attached to him starting from the 19th century. |
|---|