Les soulèvements démocratiques qui nous manquent
Based on the controversy between Enzo Traverso and Georges Didi-Huberman over the notions of revolution and uprising, this article reflects on the constitutive dimensions of democracy. The initial controversy between these two authors developed from Antonio Negri’s work, on the one hand, on the crea...
Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Lingua: | Français |
| Pubblicazione: |
2024
|
| Accesso online: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Riassunto: | Based on the controversy between Enzo Traverso and Georges Didi-Huberman over the notions of revolution and uprising, this article reflects on the constitutive dimensions of democracy. The initial controversy between these two authors developed from Antonio Negri’s work, on the one hand, on the creative breath of a creative joy and, on the other, on the notion of constituent power. This theoretical debate is then confronted with the concrete experiences of constituent moments that have characterized certain so-called progressive governments in Latin America (notably Venezuela) and the subversive emergence of fascism on Capitol Hill and in Brasília. The article concludes by proposing a way out of the impasse: instituting dynamics and Carlo Ginzburg’s return to the relationship between history and change. |
|---|