Christos Clairis, Vers une linguistique inachevée, Paris-Leuven-Dudley, Ma, Peeters, 2005, 93 p.
In French Sign Language and probably in many other sign languages, two complementary ways are used in narrative and descriptive discourses. One of them says without showing, as the other, highly iconic, says while illustrating or giving to see, in the same time. This paper shows that this second wa...
Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Langue: | Français |
| Publié: |
2007
|
| Accès en ligne: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Résumé: | In French Sign Language and probably in many other sign languages, two complementary ways are used in narrative and descriptive discourses. One of them says without showing, as the other, highly iconic, says while illustrating or giving to see, in the same time. This paper shows that this second way is also, at a pragmatic level, a base for developing strategies of reformulation. |
|---|