De la concession au libre choix en passant par la polarité : le cas de où que P et de n'importe où
Où que P and n’importe où, non specifying pro-forms, occupy regularly positions which are more satellite than those of forms such as qu- que P and n’importe qu-. The aim of this study will be to describe how relations between n’importe où or où que P and verbal nucleus interfere with their sem...
Đã lưu trong:
| Tác giả chính: | |
|---|---|
| Định dạng: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Ngôn ngữ: | Français |
| Được phát hành: |
2008
|
| Truy cập trực tuyến: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Tóm tắt: | Où que P and n’importe où, non specifying pro-forms, occupy regularly positions which are more satellite than those of forms such as qu- que P and n’importe qu-. The aim of this study will be to describe how relations between n’importe où or où que P and verbal nucleus interfere with their semantic functioning : concessive, negative polarity or free choice effects. Où que P seems to prefer the value of concessive conditionals without denying the use of polarity or the use of free choice. In the latter situation we essentially observe a more condensed integration. On the other hand, n’importe où functions generally as a free choice marker, but it accepts exceptionally a polarity application in all contexts supporting a downward monotone orientation. In this case, it prefers a more loose connection with the main clause or with one of its constituents. |
|---|