Dialogue or the other person’s patience
This study investigates dialogue as an ethical practice rooted in patience with others. Beyond its communicative role, dialogue is framed as a philosophical and moral experience necessitating openness, attentive listening, mutual recognition, and respect for human dignity. Integrating insights fr...
Сохранить в:
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Язык: | Français |
| Опубликовано: |
2026
|
| Предметы: | |
| Online-ссылка: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Итог: | This study investigates dialogue as an ethical practice rooted in patience with others. Beyond its communicative role, dialogue is framed as a philosophical and moral experience necessitating openness, attentive listening, mutual recognition, and respect for human dignity. Integrating insights from Plato, Buber, Levinas, Ricœur, Gadamer, and Habermas, the paper posits that authentic dialogue requires patience, defined as the readiness to accept the other’s uniqueness and afford adequate time for genuine understanding. Through philosophical literature analysis, the study first examines the conceptual bases of dialogue and alterity. It then discusses patience as an ethical virtue supporting interpersonal relationships by mitigating prejudice, intolerance, and communicative dominance. Ultimately, the article asserts that dialogue, as the patience of the other, is crucial for peaceful coexistence in pluralistic societies. It contributes to conflict prevention and resolution, intercultural and interreligious understanding, democratic engagement, and social cohesion. The research concludes that dialogue is an ethical disposition, not solely a communication method, fostering responsibility, solidarity, and the common good. In an era of polarization and digital communication, cultivating patience through dialogue offers a critical path to peace and authentic coexistence.
|
|---|