Confiance et transition énergétique : l’adoption de l’innovation sous le prisme de l’apprentissage collectif
Trust can be defined as a behaviour, a belief, an intention or an outcome with ethical or moral dimensions. We have defined trust as a collective learning process based on a judgement and a belief about the intentions of the partner (Lazaric, Lorenz, 1998). The difficulties encountered in the deploy...
Gorde:
| Egile nagusia: | |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Hizkuntza: | Français |
| Argitaratua: |
2025
|
| Gaiak: | |
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Gaia: | Trust can be defined as a behaviour, a belief, an intention or an outcome with ethical or moral dimensions. We have defined trust as a collective learning process based on a judgement and a belief about the intentions of the partner (Lazaric, Lorenz, 1998). The difficulties encountered in the deployment of smart meters in France with Linky, created distrust and raised issues about trust and the ethical practices of actors in the energy sector. We show how and why trust is a social dynamic based on precise coordination procedures that mobilise transparency, respect and integrity in interactions. In the case of energy transition, institutional trust plays a key role. It cannot be imposed, but is built through the implementation of decentralised democratic dynamics as advocated by Ostrom (1990).JEL Codes : D83, O33, O38, M21 |
|---|