Debt and Wages: The Role of Labor Regulation
In this paper, we investigate how labor regulation interacts with financial leverage to explain the level of compensation firms pay to their employees. Firm leverage increases the risk of layoffs of employees and decreases their bargaining power, implying opposite effects on their pay level. Employm...
Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Sprog: | Français |
| Udgivet: |
2025
|
| Fag: | |
| Online adgang: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Summary: | In this paper, we investigate how labor regulation interacts with financial leverage to explain the level of compensation firms pay to their employees. Firm leverage increases the risk of layoffs of employees and decreases their bargaining power, implying opposite effects on their pay level. Employment protection laws, however, protect employees from the risk of displacement and increase their bargaining power, thus moderating the effect of leverage on employees’ compensation. Testing this hypothesis on a large sample of OECD firms over the 1990-2018 period, we document that the correlation between leverage and employee pay is consistently lower in countries with tighter labor laws. Notably, our results hold in a stacked difference-in-difference (stacked DiD) setting exploiting major labor market reforms worldwide. Additional tests show that our results are consistent with both the risk premium and pressure effects associated with leverage. Finally, we show that strong creditor rights, a more centralized wage-bargaining process, and higher levels of unionization tend to mitigate the cross effect of leverage and employment protection laws on average employee pay. JEL Classification: G30; G32; J30 |
|---|