Parole prophétique et discours analytique
When Ezekiel received as an order to eat the book, the same order that is repeated in the Apocalypse of Saint John, it was to inaugurate the prophetic word. The issue here is that the relation to the original text, to the materiality of the Letter – what is most real in language we might suggest – i...
Gardado en:
| Autor Principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Idioma: | Français |
| Publicado: |
2024
|
| Acceso en liña: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| id |
cairn-ESS_053_0067 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
cairn |
| spelling |
cairn-ESS_053_0067ESSEssaim https://shs.cairn.info/revue-essaim-2024-2-page-67?lang=fr https://doi.org/10.3917/ess.053.0067 Parole prophétique et discours analytique Rassial, Jean-Jacques2024 fre Essaim | 53 | 2 | 2024-10-02 | p. 67-72 | 1287-258X ESS_05324 When Ezekiel received as an order to eat the book, the same order that is repeated in the Apocalypse of Saint John, it was to inaugurate the prophetic word. The issue here is that the relation to the original text, to the materiality of the Letter – what is most real in language we might suggest – is that the relation to the textual, to textual knowledge, is not a relation of commentary on referential knowledge in Jewish prophecy. Undoubtedly, in the digestion of S2, the analysand’s knowledge, the analyst, through the act of interpretation is closer to the position of the prophet than of the commentator. Should we likewise read Lacan beyond the commentary?Quand Ézéchiel reçoit comme consigne de manger le livre, ordre répété dans l’Apocalypse de saint Jean, c’est pour inaugurer la parole prophétique. Ce qui nous importe ici, c’est que le rapport au texte d’origine, à la matérialité de la Lettre – ce que la langue a de plus réel, pourrait-on proposer – c’est que le rapport au textuel, au savoir textuel, n’est pas un rapport de commentaire du savoir référentiel dans la prophétie juive. Sans doute, dans sa digestion de S2, savoir de l’analysant, l’analyste dans son acte d’interprétation, voisine-t-il plus avec la position du prophète qu’avec celle du commentateur. Doit-on de même lire Lacan au-delà du commentaire ?Cairn restricted access |
| language |
Français |
| format |
Article ou chapitre numérique |
| building |
0/Bibliothèque numérique/ 1/Bibliothèque numérique/Cairn/ |
| description |
When Ezekiel received as an order to eat the book, the same order that is repeated in the Apocalypse of Saint John, it was to inaugurate the prophetic word. The issue here is that the relation to the original text, to the materiality of the Letter – what is most real in language we might suggest – is that the relation to the textual, to textual knowledge, is not a relation of commentary on referential knowledge in Jewish prophecy. Undoubtedly, in the digestion of S2, the analysand’s knowledge, the analyst, through the act of interpretation is closer to the position of the prophet than of the commentator. Should we likewise read Lacan beyond the commentary? |
| author |
Rassial, Jean-Jacques |
| spellingShingle |
Rassial, Jean-Jacques Parole prophétique et discours analytique |
| author_facet |
Rassial, Jean-Jacques |
| author_sort |
Rassial, Jean-Jacques |
| title |
Parole prophétique et discours analytique |
| title_short |
Parole prophétique et discours analytique |
| title_full |
Parole prophétique et discours analytique |
| title_fullStr |
Parole prophétique et discours analytique |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Parole prophétique et discours analytique |
| title_sort |
parole prophétique et discours analytique |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| container_title |
|
| container_issue |
|
| url |
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://shs.cairn.info/revue-essaim-2024-2-page-67?lang=fr https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.3917/ess.053.0067 |
| _version_ |
1877245862026936320 |