L’intelligence artificielle et l’évaluation des atteintes au corps humain : entre outils d’aide à la décision et risque de barémisation
The DataJust project was intended to collect data from the Court of Cassation, the highest court in the French judicial system, on the compensation awarded in hundreds of thousands of cases, in order to create an indicative benchmark. However, given the difficulty of the task, this project was withd...
Uloženo v:
| Hlavní autor: | |
|---|---|
| Médium: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Jazyk: | Français |
| Vydáno: |
2024
|
| Témata: | |
| On-line přístup: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Shrnutí: | The DataJust project was intended to collect data from the Court of Cassation, the highest court in the French judicial system, on the compensation awarded in hundreds of thousands of cases, in order to create an indicative benchmark. However, given the difficulty of the task, this project was withdrawn. The door is therefore now open to private initiatives. But the formulas they use for their algorithms are rarely transparent. Moreover, another pressing issue arises: the algorithms may encourage judges to award fixed sums and no longer individualize compensation. Finally, such tools risk hampering developments in the field of personal injury law, and the outcomes proposed by artificial intelligence may turn out to be a kind of self-fulfilling prophecy. A framework for artificial intelligence in such a sensitive area therefore seems necessary, such as the one adopted by the European Commission in 2018, the “European Ethical Charter on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems and their Environment.” Discipline: LAW |
|---|