Attachement excessif au droit statutaire à l’université : à la recherche du lien perdu
This article contributes to emerging research on excessive faculty entitlement (Ratnam and Craig 2021; EFE in the text), i.e., excessive attachment to statutory rights at university. According to this body of work, the prerogatives associated with academic status should be called into question in th...
Enregistré dans:
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| 語言: | Français |
| 出版: |
2024
|
| 主題: | |
| 在線閱讀: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| 總結: | This article contributes to emerging research on excessive faculty entitlement (Ratnam and Craig 2021; EFE in the text), i.e., excessive attachment to statutory rights at university. According to this body of work, the prerogatives associated with academic status should be called into question in the name of the fight against discrimination, in order to promote more inclusive approaches. The phenomenon, which is in the process of becoming a subject of research, can be illuminated by the analysis of bureaucracies proposed by Lacan on the basis of the work of Kojève and Hegel. Linked with what Lacan (1969-1970) calls academic discourse, where knowledge, in the position of agent, prevents the emergence of other forms of discourse, bureaucratic discourse clashes, sometimes violently, with the caring professions. The multi-case study is based on a cross-case analysis of situations guided by clinical psychoanalysis. Drawing on a casuistic approach to controversies arising from critical management studies, it analyzes longitudinal data from an immersive collection with regard to the main points of tension affecting the subjects of speech in the context of work. The study leads to several observations. It highlights the need for everyone to analyze their own professional situation, which can be considered symptomatic in the psychoanalytic sense of the term (“what I can’t help myself from”), by becoming aware of the defensive and imaginary mechanisms at play in the exercise of an excessive attachment to status (excessive entitlement) for those charged with producing the “inclusive universal” (Tosel 2011). The data thus enable us to grasp the issues involved in building a professional style that is open to diversity, over and above the injunctions to include. |
|---|