Les défis du méga-régionalisme
After sparking interest in the 2010s, negotiations of mega-regional agreements have, for the most part, failed. However, the concept is flexible enough to remain of interest in the current context of stalled multilateralism and rising unilateralism. Today, preferential trade negotiations are fewer i...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Sprache: | Français |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2025
|
| Online Zugang: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Zusammenfassung: | After sparking interest in the 2010s, negotiations of mega-regional agreements have, for the most part, failed. However, the concept is flexible enough to remain of interest in the current context of stalled multilateralism and rising unilateralism. Today, preferential trade negotiations are fewer in number and less ambitious, particularly in the United States, the European Union and China. When preferential agreements are indeed concluded, they seem to be following a “logic of blocs”, more selective, between States sharing similar political orientations. While some areas, such as e-commerce and intellectual property protection, appear to be recurrent, the rules adopted vary from one agreement to the next. Divergences are particularly striking on a subject as crucial as state capitalism and make it unlikely that the “logic of blocs” will be overcome. |
|---|